Re: Conodont elements
[I wrote]
>One hypothesis I (and I am sure others) have considered is the
>possibility the bedding plane assemblages represent the "rest" or
>some other position of the apparatus rather than the "functional"
>position -- i.e. the geometry that has been reconstructed is *not* the
>operational geometry.
[Paul Smith wrote]
|As one of the authors of the Aldridge et al. 1987 paper, I can confirm
|that this idea has been previously considered - in that paper (p.73) we
|clearly stated that the reconstruction presented, and the attitude of
|most bedding plane assemblages, is the resting position. We were
|not the first, the idea had previously been forwarded by, at least,
|Lennart Jeppsson and Stefan Bengtson.
<Blush> I knew I had seen it somewhere before :-) I should have
known where. Thanks.
So *if* that interpretation is correct, I guess the obvious
question is -- what was the operational geometry, and is there any
evidence in the bedding plane assemblages that could help determine it?
One of the things I have noticed is *slight* variations in the
bedding plane assemblages that can not be accounted for by a single 3D
model. To a first approximation, the proposed model works really well,
but sometimes the M elements are positioned a bit differently, and
sometimes (and this should be no suprise) the Pa elements are rotated in
the opposed "scissor-like" fashion, with the blades overlapping more and
the platforms opened (e.g., as described in Purnell and von Bitter, 1992).
When the Pa elements do this, the Pb elements are often overlapped to a
greater degree as well (coordination? Or just similar compression-related
effects?). If enough bedding-plane assemblages were examined, I wonder
whether different positions for the elements could be resolved despite the
variable orientation of the compressions? Could this indicate how the
elements could move and/or which moved independently when operating?
-Andrew
macrae@geo.ucalgary.ca
home page: "http://geo.ucalgary.ca/~macrae/current_projects.html"
Partial index:
|